Previously, three-quarters of schools rated as inadequate by Ofsted later improved without forced academisation. The trust retains a proportion of the school’s funding for its administration and executive costs.ĭoes forced academisation improve schools? Often the school is renamed and a new uniform adopted. The school’s governors lose legal responsibilities, and there is no requirement for trusts to consult with parents. In most cases the school’s existing leadership is dismissed. Head teachers are stripped of their autonomy, with budget and staffing decisions made by the trust. The school’s land and buildings are effectively leased to the trust. The school’s legal relationship becomes a contract between the trust that manages it and the DfE, cutting ties with local authorities. Critics say this is a derogation of local democracy. They also have no say in which trust the school is forced to join, meaning the chain may be based hundreds of miles away. Governing bodies, parents and councils get no input in the DfE’s intervention to force academisation. Previously it could also be triggered by poor performances in exams but that condition was dropped by the education secretary, Damian Hinds, in 2018. The order is triggered by a school being classed as inadequate by Ofsted. A school is forced to become an academy if it is “eligible for intervention” under law. “Forced academisation” describes how a state school in England is compelled to change its legal status from a school overseen by a local authority to that of an academy, and to accept new management by an academy trust.įorced academisation is an order issued by the Department for Education (DfE).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |